August 27, 2010
An operator of two Minneapolis cab companies filed a constitutional challenge to City of Minneapolis ordinances requiring the companies to have 5 percent of its fleet be fuel efficient by 2007.
The operator testified at a hearing opposing the ordinance. Other witnesses supported the fuel-efficiency requirement because it would curb vehicle emissions and fight smog.
In January 2008 the operator was cited by the City for violating the provision. At a hearing the operator argued the ordinance violated constitutional substantive due process. A hearing officer affirmed the citations and noted he had no authority to determine the constitutionality of the ordinance.
The operator filed an appeal with the Minnesota Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals found that the purpose behind the fuel efficient vehicle ordinance is environmental sustainability. The Court of Appeals found that the operator failed to produce evidence demonstrating the fuel efficiency requirement lacked a rational relationship to the City’s sustainability objective. A copy of the Minnesota Court of Appeals decision is found at: http://minnlawyer.com/eadvantage/wp-files/083010_fulltext_coa/opa091713-0824.html.
At Hessian & McKasy’s Environmental Law Attorney Practice Group our environmental attorneys track environmental case law developments. We represent businesses and individuals on environmental matters but also in other types of disputes.
Our environmental attorneys appear in federal and state courts and in administrative proceedings before federal and state environmental authorities. For more information on Hessian & McKasy’s Environmental Law Attorney Practice Group’s professional services please visithttp://www.enviroattorney.net/practice/professional_services.php.
The views contained within this entry and on this website are my own and do not constitute those of Hessian & McKasy, P.A.
To receive www.enviroattorney.net blog updates and posts, please provide your e-mail address in the space at the top of this page.